On 11 October, CTLE held a professional development seminar which featured 5 UM students as panelists to explore their perspectives on learning with generative AI (GenAI). The event attracted over 40 UM academic staff from different faculties.
The panel discussion, moderated by Director of CTLE, Prof. Katrine Wong, was a continuation of CTLE’s half-day event which spotlighted the latest research and teaching practices on GenAI. Participants were delighted to hear from 3 undergraduate students – Mr. Paco Chao (FAH), Ms. Vilena Wong (FBA), Mr. Kevin Chao (FED) – and 2 postgraduate students – Ms. Faye Liu (FED) and Ms. Renee Hu (FSS).
Panelists shared their thoughts and concerns regarding learning with GenAI. They spoke on the following points:
- How are you using GenAI tools?
- Do you have any concerns regarding GenAI in general?
- Do you have any concerns regarding GenAI in assessments?
- What kind of support do you think you and your peers need with regards to learning with GenAI?
Students found GenAI a useful tool in various aspects of their academic and extra-curricular experiences, such as researching, writing assignments and even designing activities. Other uses of GenAI, as shared by the students, include summarizing and analyzing articles, as well as generating images and even memes for communication. Students found that GenAI can help them save time and help them understand complex ideas. Descriptions of GenAI tools varied: personal tutor, search engine, language learning tool, coding assistant.
On the second question about concerns regarding GenAI usage in general, students agreed that they could receive potentially biased, incomplete and incorrect information upon receiving responses from GenAI tools. Privacy issues, academic honesty, equity and accessibility, as well as ethical practices were among their main concerns. There was a need for education on how to use GenAI effectively in academic settings. Students also expressed that the way of learning and assessment might need to be changed. In addition, the student panelists were aware that an over-reliance on GenAI could lead to decreased levels of independence, creativity and critical thinking.
Students suggested that guidance and support be provided for them, specifically, AI literacy training. They then continued to discuss the importance of understanding the mechanism and limitations of GenAI. The panel discussion ended on a positive note: teachers are important because they provide students with genuine encouragement, human guidance and emotional support, which contribute greatly towards positive learning experiences.
Participants exchanged views with the student panelists whilst leaving questions via an audience response system. Discussion continued after the event finished.
A series of teaching blog posts have been published on CTLE website regarding the integrating AI technologies in teaching, learning and assessment. CTLE is at your service in this rapidly evolving digital era of teaching and learning.
CTLE辦教師專業發展研討會 與澳大學生探討應用GenAI學習
10 月 11 日,教與學優化中心舉辦專業發展研討會,邀請5 名澳大學生參與討論小組,與逾40名澳大教職員共同探討學生對生成式人工智能 (GenAI)學習的看法。
小組討論由中心主任王嘉祺教授主持,是此前半天教師專業發展活動的延續(重點探索GenAI在教與學中的應用、研究成果展示與實踐)。幾位澳大本科學生包括Paco Chao 先生 (人文學院)、Vilena Wong 小姐 (工商管理學院)、Kevin Chao 先生 (教育學院)及 澳大研究生 Faye Liu 小姐(教育學院)和 Renee Hu小姐(社會科學學院),跟與會教職員分享及交流。
小組成員分享了他們對 GenAI 學習的想法和關注,討論圍繞以下要點:
- 你如何使用 GenAI 工具?
- 你對 GenAI 整體上有任何疑慮嗎?
- 你對 GenAI 評估有任何疑慮嗎?
- 你認為學生在使用 GenAI 學習上需甚麼支援?
同學們利用 GenAI 工具協助他們優化學術或課外體驗,例如幫助研究、寫作業,甚至設計活動;他們還分享了GenAI如何幫助總結和分析文章、生成圖像用作交流;此外,它還可以幫助學生節省時間,並理解複雜的想法。 學生們對GenAI的描述各有不同,包括個人導師、搜尋引擎、語言學習、編碼助理等。
對於一般使用GenAI的疑慮,同學們一致認為,在收到 GenAI 的回答時,他們或會同時收到潛在的偏見、不完整和不正確的資訊;他們也關注GenAI的私隱問題、學術誠信、公平性和可用性,以及道德實踐等方面;同學們認為需開展相關教學,協助他們了解如何在學術環境中有效使用 GenAI ,或使相關學習和評估的方式作出改變。 此外同學們還意識到,過度依賴 GenAI 或會減低學習獨立性、創造力和批判性思維。
同學們希望校方為他們提供使用GenAI的指導和支援,特別是AI認知能力的培訓;他們還重點關注 GenAI 運作原理和限制等。小組討論最後作正面的總結,同學們均認為老師在教學上相當重要,因為他們為學生提供真誠鼓勵、人性化指導和情感支持,有效促進積極的學習體驗。在場教職員與學生們積極交流,活動結束後仍在線上互動工具繼續討論。
如想了解更多關將AI技術融入教學、學習和評估,請訪問CTLE網站的教學博客系列。 在這快速發展的數碼教學時代裡,我們竭誠為您服務。
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.